Disclaimer: The following material is being kept online for archival purposes.

Although accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information, and parts may not function in current web browsers.

Site Map
Lesson plan (frames)
Questions & Answers
Central Home Page

(22b) The Theory of Relativity


22a.Starlight Aberration

22b. Relativity

22c. Flight (1)

22d. Flight (2)

23. Inertial Forces

23a. The Centrifugal Force

  23b. Loop-the-Loop

  24a.The Rotating Earth

24b. Rotating Frames

    Relativity is beyond the scope of this exposition, but it deserves at least a brief discussion.

    By Newton's laws, two frames of reference moving with constant velocity relative to each other observe exactly the same physical behavior. There exists no way to tell, which of them is moving and which one is at rest: there is no "absolute rest frame" and no "absolute (constant) velocity. " Everything is relative, and either frame can be chosen as reference benchmark.

    In the 19th century the laws of electricity and magnetism were discovered, and suggesting that light itself was a related phenomenon, an electromagnetic wave (as is further discussed in the sections about the Sun). But for a while it seemed that by certain subtle effects, electromagnetic forces could distinguish whether a frame was in motion of not. Those effects were hard to verify, and when they were finally tried out, they did not work--they could not tell which system was in motion.

    Albert Einstein then proposed, in 1905, the "principle of relativity" as a fundamental property of the universe. No matter what physical process was used, absolute motion at a constant velocity was undetectable. No loophole existed, not even through the laws of electricity and magnetism.

    The trouble was, changing those laws (to plug the apparent loophole) would have upset the electromagnetic theory of light, for which ample evidence existed--e.g. radio waves. Einstein therefore suggested that those laws were correct and instead, Newton's laws were the ones needing to be modified--even though those laws already did hold that absolute motion was undetectable. Furthermore, time intervals measured in different moving frames of reference did not always agree--time became "relative."

    The modifications suggested by Einstein only became significant near the velocity of light, and in day-to-day phenomena it could be ignored. As the velocity of light was approached, however, inertia (i.e. mass) increased, making it harder and harder to accelerate any matter and setting that velocity as an absolute limit, which no material object could exceed.

   All those predictions have been amply confirmed by experiments, and particle accelerators in particular have left little doubt that particles get more massive as they approach the velocity of light, and that velocity is indeed an upper limit which cannot be passed. The relativity of time was demonstrated when it was found that muons--particles with a lifetime of about 2 microseconds--produced by fast atomic nuclei ("cosmic rays") high in the atmosphere, survived much longer and generally reached the Earth's surface, because in the frame of reference of the Earth, their lifetime seemed longer.

Questions from Users:  
Build a straight tower in warped space?

Next Stop: #22c Airplane Flight

            Timeline                     Glossary                     Back to the Master List

Author and Curator:   Dr. David P. Stern
     Mail to Dr.Stern:   stargaze("at" symbol)phy6.org .

Last updated: 5-20-2008

Above is background material for archival reference only.

NASA Logo, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA Official: Adam Szabo

Curators: Robert Candey, Alex Young, Tamara Kovalick

NASA Privacy, Security, Notices